Metadata-Version: 2.1
Name: octohook
Version: 0.1
Summary: Typed interactions with Github Webhooks
Home-page: https://github.com/doodla/octohook
Author: Sridhar Vadlamani
Author-email: v.sridhar.sreenivas@gmail.com
License: UNKNOWN
Description: ![PyPI - Python Version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/octohook) ![PyPI - Status](https://img.shields.io/pypi/status/octohook) ![PyPI - License](https://img.shields.io/pypi/l/octohook)
        
        ## Octohook
        
        Octohook makes working with incoming [Github Webhooks](https://developer.github.com/v3/activity/events/types/) extremely easy. 
        
        It parses the incoming payload into Python classes to allow for auto-complete and other goodies. For example, `octohook` provides functions for payload values which require string interpolation.
        
        For example, almost every repository payload has an `archive_url` with some required and conditional parameters.
        ```json
        {
          "repository" : {
            "archive_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/doodla/octohook-playground/{archive_format}{/ref}"
          }
        }
        
        ```
        
        The `Repository` model provides an `archive_url()` method which has `archive_format` as an argument and `ref` as an optional variable.
        
        ```
        >>> repo.archive_url("hello")
        https://api.github.com/repos/doodla/octohook-playground/hello
        >>> repo.archive_url("hello","world")
        https://api.github.com/repos/doodla/octohook-playground/hello/world"
        ```
        
        ### Gotchas
        
        Github doesn't send consistent payloads for each model. Depending on the event type, you can get more information for a particular model, or less.
        For example, Github sends a `changes` key with some payloads with the `edited` action. For other actions, the key is not present. In such cases, our `event.changes` is `None`.
        
        This can happen for arbitrary payloads, so I'd suggest tailoring your code to the expected incoming webhook.
        
        If anyone has a good suggestion on how to tackle this issue, feel free to email me, or create a PR!
        
        Because Github sends different payloads for a combination of `event type` and `action`, unless I have access to all the variations, I cannot be sure that the corresponding model is correct.
        
        Current coverage is documented [here](tests/TestCases.md). If you can provide any of the missing events, please make a PR.
        ### Sample Usage
        
        #### app.py
        ```python
        from flask import Flask, request, Response
        import octohook
        from octohook.events import PullRequestEvent
        from octohook.models import PullRequest, Repository
        
        app = Flask(__name__)
        
        @app.route('/webhook', methods=['POST'])
        def webhook():
            github_event = request.headers.get('X-GitHub-Event') # pull_request
            
            # Assuming the incoming event was a PullRequestEvent
            event : PullRequestEvent = octohook.parse(github_event, request.json)
        
            return Response(event.pull_request.head.user.name, status=200)
        ```
        
        
Platform: UNKNOWN
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.7
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.8
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9
Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
Classifier: Operating System :: OS Independent
Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries
Classifier: Topic :: Software Development :: Libraries :: Python Modules
Requires-Python: >=3.7
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
